ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ACWL.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - ACWL.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWL.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for WNRG.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWL.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.

Performance

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ACWL.L is traded in GBp, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWL.L achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWL.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 11.91%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.

ACWL.L

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -2.29%
• 6M: 7.05%
• YTD: 9.65%
• 1Y: 20.79%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

WNRG.L

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.20%
• 6M: 21.06%
• YTD: 27.93%
• 1Y: 37.02%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 21.10%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	9.65%	13.83%	19.51%	15.70%	-8.90%	20.22%	12.15%	21.81%	-4.79%	13.09%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	27.93%	6.65%	3.85%	-1.65%	64.04%	40.05%	-32.40%	5.71%	-9.95%	-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWL.L and WNRG.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2011	0.50

The correlation between ACWL.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWL.L

ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

WNRG.L

WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWL.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.71	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.19	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.31	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	2.23	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.22	5.81	+5.41

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWL.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWL.L drawdown since its inception was -42.23%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWL.L and WNRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWL.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.23%	-59.34%	+17.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.06%	-16.52%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.21%	-21.66%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.21%	-22.11%	+3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.24%	-59.34%	+34.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-10.03%	+6.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.48%	-12.66%	+2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	6.35%	-4.50%

Volatility

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) is 3.35%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that ACWL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWL.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	6.42%	-3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	18.68%	-10.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	21.51%	-10.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	23.88%	-10.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.31%	33.22%	-18.91%

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWL.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWL.L nor WNRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWL.L and WNRG.L in my portfolio?

ACWL.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACWL.L or WNRG.L?

On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWL.L or WNRG.L?

WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.

What is the main difference between ACWL.L and WNRG.L?

ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWL.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.