ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L
ACWL.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANRJ.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWL.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 16.23%/yr for ANRJ.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWL.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ANRJ.L.
Performance
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWL.L achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than ANRJ.L's 27.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWL.L has underperformed ANRJ.L with an annualized return of 13.71%, while ANRJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.
ACWL.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
ANRJ.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 27.53%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 66.23%
- 3Y*
- 33.07%
- 5Y*
- 28.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 12.22% | 13.63% | 21.43% | 13.09% | -8.59% | 20.41% | 9.74% | 18.01% | 2.02% | 11.14% |
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 27.53% | 43.26% | 10.68% | 9.79% | 44.73% | 26.52% | -27.94% | 3.65% | 0.61% | 9.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWL.L and ANRJ.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2015 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, ACWL.L and ANRJ.L have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
Financial Services
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
-
Industrials
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
Consumer Cyclical
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
Communication Services
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
-
Healthcare
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
-
Energy
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
-
Basic Materials
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
Utilities
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
Real Estate
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWL.L
ANRJ.L
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWL.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.66 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 8.15 | -3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.39 | 26.14 | -8.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWL.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 4.01 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.89 | 1.36 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.60 | 0.66 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.35 | 0.49 | +1.87 |
Drawdowns
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWL.L drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum ANRJ.L drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWL.L and ANRJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWL.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -57.08% | +38.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -8.08% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.15% | -13.17% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.15% | -19.81% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.15% | -57.08% | +38.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -3.59% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -11.86% | +9.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.53% | -0.82% |
Volatility
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) is 2.63%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that ACWL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWL.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 6.93% | -4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.99% | 13.53% | -6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.84% | 16.43% | -6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 21.21% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 24.69% | -1.37% |
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWL.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWL.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWL.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANRJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANRJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.
ACWL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ANRJ.L is Energy Equities. ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWL.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWL.L and ANRJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer