ACWL.L vs. 100D.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWL.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and 100D.L (Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while 100D.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACWL.L returned 12.39%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for 100D.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWL.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for 100D.L.

Performance

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWL.L achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than 100D.L's 5.90% return.

ACWL.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 6.05%
• YTD: 12.44%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 13.73%

100D.L

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 21.38%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	12.44%	13.63%	21.43%	13.09%	-8.59%	20.41%	9.74%	12.21%
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	5.90%	25.77%	9.32%	7.37%	4.80%	18.00%	-11.78%	4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWL.L and 100D.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019	0.23

Over the past year, ACWL.L and 100D.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWL.L	100D.L
Technology	29.3%	0.8%
Financial Services	16.2%	24.5%
Industrials	10.9%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	4.7%
Communication Services	9.0%	2.6%
Healthcare	8.1%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	13.9%
Energy	4.2%	11.7%
Basic Materials	3.7%	8.5%
Utilities	2.6%	5.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.9%

Return for Risk

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWL.L

ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

100D.L

100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWL.L	100D.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	1.94	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	2.68	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.37	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	2.39	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.67	8.13	+9.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the 100D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWL.L and 100D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWL.L	100D.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	1.94	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.90	0.91	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.36	0.53	+1.83

Drawdowns

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWL.L drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum 100D.L drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWL.L and 100D.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWL.L	100D.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-34.63%	+16.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.06%	-8.92%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.15%	-13.06%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.15%	-13.06%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-4.12%	+3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-4.69%	+2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	2.62%	-0.91%

Volatility

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) is 2.64%, while Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that ACWL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWL.L	100D.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	4.28%	-1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.02%	9.53%	-2.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.88%	10.96%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	12.88%	+3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.34%	15.93%	+7.41%

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWL.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison

ACWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	3.57%	3.78%	4.17%	3.90%	3.80%	3.39%	3.11%	4.30%
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWL.L and 100D.L in my portfolio?

ACWL.L and 100D.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACWL.L or 100D.L?

On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWL.L or 100D.L?

100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.

What is the main difference between ACWL.L and 100D.L?

ACWL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 100D.L is Europe Equities. ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWL.L and 0.14% for 100D.L.