ACWI vs. VXUS
ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ACWI tracks the MSCI All Country World Index while VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWI returned 13.07%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWI charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
ACWI vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 13.07%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
ACWI vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 9.71% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.42% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI and VXUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.93 |
The correlation between ACWI and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACWI vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWI
VXUS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWI
VXUS
Financial Services
ACWI
VXUS
Industrials
ACWI
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
ACWI
VXUS
Communication Services
ACWI
VXUS
Healthcare
ACWI
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
ACWI
VXUS
Basic Materials
ACWI
VXUS
Energy
ACWI
VXUS
Utilities
ACWI
VXUS
Real Estate
ACWI
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWI vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
ACWI
VXUS
ACWI vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWI | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.44 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 9.35 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWI vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWI | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | -35.97% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.73% | -11.27% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -13.58% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -29.44% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.53% | -35.97% | +2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -3.12% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -8.19% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.93% | -0.69% |
Volatility
ACWI vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is 5.57%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that ACWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWI | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 7.07% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.35% | 14.44% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 16.34% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 16.27% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 17.02% | +0.05% |
ACWI vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWI vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ACWI and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXUS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to ACWI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 13.07% vs 10.22% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.46% for ACWI.
ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.05% for VXUS.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWI and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer