PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWI vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWI vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 13.07%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.


ACWI

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
9.71%
6M
8.77%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.07%

VXUS

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.31%
YTD
12.42%
6M
12.16%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
9.71%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
12.42%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and VXUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.93

The correlation between ACWI and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWI vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWI
VXUS

Technology

33.0%
21.0%

Financial Services

15.9%
21.7%

Industrials

10.3%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
8.2%

Communication Services

8.0%
4.4%

Healthcare

7.7%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
7.6%

Energy

3.6%
4.7%

Utilities

2.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.4%

Technology

ACWI
33.0%
VXUS
21.0%

Financial Services

ACWI
15.9%
VXUS
21.7%

Industrials

ACWI
10.3%
VXUS
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWI
8.6%
VXUS
8.2%

Communication Services

ACWI
8.0%
VXUS
4.4%

Healthcare

ACWI
7.7%
VXUS
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

ACWI
4.7%
VXUS
4.8%

Basic Materials

ACWI
3.6%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

ACWI
3.6%
VXUS
4.7%

Utilities

ACWI
2.7%
VXUS
3.0%

Real Estate

ACWI
1.6%
VXUS
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWI vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWIVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.44

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

9.35

+1.31

ACWI vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWIVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.00%

-35.97%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-11.27%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-13.58%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-29.44%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-35.97%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-3.12%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-8.19%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.93%

-0.69%

Volatility

ACWI vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is 5.57%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that ACWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWIVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

7.07%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

14.44%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

16.34%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

16.27%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

17.02%

+0.05%

ACWI vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWI vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.46%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.59%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ACWI and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VXUS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to ACWI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 13.07% vs 10.22% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.46% for ACWI.

ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.05% for VXUS.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer