PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWI vs. VEGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWI vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than VEGA's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has outperformed VEGA with an annualized return of 12.82%, while VEGA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.


ACWI

1D
0.30%
1M
4.45%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.82%

VEGA

1D
0.29%
1M
2.60%
YTD
7.40%
6M
7.26%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.47%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
7.40%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.36%8.37%19.29%-6.58%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and VEGA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2012

0.73

The correlation between ACWI and VEGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACWI vs. VEGA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWI
VEGA

Technology

29.4%
31.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
14.6%

Industrials

10.9%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.6%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
2.6%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

ACWI
29.4%
VEGA
31.7%

Financial Services

ACWI
16.1%
VEGA
14.6%

Industrials

ACWI
10.9%
VEGA
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWI
9.3%
VEGA
10.1%

Communication Services

ACWI
9.0%
VEGA
9.3%

Healthcare

ACWI
8.1%
VEGA
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ACWI
5.0%
VEGA
4.6%

Energy

ACWI
4.2%
VEGA
3.5%

Basic Materials

ACWI
3.7%
VEGA
2.6%

Utilities

ACWI
2.6%
VEGA
2.6%

Real Estate

ACWI
1.8%
VEGA
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWI vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWIVEGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.76

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

12.41

+1.15

ACWI vs. VEGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VEGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI and VEGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWIVEGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.09

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.60

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.63

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.53

-0.10

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than VEGA's maximum drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and VEGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWIVEGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.00%

-28.37%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-6.86%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-11.62%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-22.78%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-28.37%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.23%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-3.79%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.52%

+0.64%

Volatility

ACWI vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) at 2.65%. This indicates that ACWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWIVEGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

2.65%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

7.45%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

9.06%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

12.29%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

12.70%

+4.41%

ACWI vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWI vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than VEGA's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.25%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ACWI and VEGA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VEGA (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs VEGA's -28.37%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.82% vs 7.95% for VEGA. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.25% for VEGA.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 2.02% for VEGA.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI and VEGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer