ACWI vs. PJBF
ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ACWI is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. ACWI charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.
Performance
ACWI vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
PJBF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 0.27% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% |
ACWI vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWI
PJBF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
ACWI
PJBF
Financial Services
ACWI
PJBF
Industrials
ACWI
PJBF
Consumer Cyclical
ACWI
PJBF
Healthcare
ACWI
PJBF
Communication Services
ACWI
PJBF
Consumer Defensive
ACWI
PJBF
Energy
ACWI
PJBF
-
Basic Materials
ACWI
PJBF
-
Utilities
ACWI
PJBF
Real Estate
ACWI
PJBF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWI vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank
ACWI
PJBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWI vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWI | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWI vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and PJBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWI | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | 0.00% | -56.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | 0.00% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | 0.00% | -8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | — | — |
Volatility
ACWI vs. PJBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWI | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 0.00% | +13.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 0.00% | +16.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 0.00% | +17.04% |
ACWI vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWI vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison
ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.59% for PJBF.
Find the right allocation for ACWI and PJBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer