PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ACWI vs. NTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ACWI vs. NTES

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index, while NTES (NetEase, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ACWI returned 13.02%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for NTES. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACWI vs. NTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than NTES's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has underperformed NTES with an annualized return of 13.02%, while NTES has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.

ACWI

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.34%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
13.02%

NTES

1D
0.17%
1M
8.84%
YTD
-7.12%
6M
-8.13%
1Y
-0.38%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. NTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		10.59%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.		-7.12%58.28%-1.73%30.59%-27.35%7.11%57.88%34.66%-31.31%62.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and NTES is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

NetEase, Inc.

Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. VTI
Often compared with NTES:
NTES vs. TCEHYNTES vs. BIDUNTES vs. SENTES vs. BILINTES vs. AONNTES vs. SAPNTES vs. SPY

Return for Risk

ACWI vs. NTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
NTES
NTES Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTES Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTES Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. NTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ACWINTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.90
-0.10

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.62
0.07

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.01

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

-0.10

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

-0.17

+11.63

ACWI vs. NTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the NTES Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI and NTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. NTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, smaller than the maximum NTES drawdown of -96.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and NTES.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ACWINTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.00%

-96.54%

+40.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-30.46%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-33.97%

+17.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-51.38%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-57.34%

+23.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-19.45%

+17.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-24.66%

+16.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

17.18%

-14.96%

Volatility

ACWI vs. NTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is 5.17%, while NetEase, Inc. (NTES) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that ACWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ACWINTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

9.60%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

20.92%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

29.31%

-15.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

43.67%

-27.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

41.81%

-24.67%

Dividends

ACWI vs. NTES - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than NTES's 2.40% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.40%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.		2.40%2.21%2.74%1.88%2.10%0.80%0.97%3.19%0.71%1.05%1.36%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

ACWI and NTES have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTES has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to ACWI (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs NTES's -96.54%.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI and NTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer