ACWI vs. ALTL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL).
ACWI and ALTL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. ALTL is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. Both ACWI and ALTL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ACWI vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACWI vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | -2.21% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 23.81% |
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 2.39% | 16.61% | 12.30% | -15.85% | -10.67% | 45.30% | 33.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.39% return.
ACWI
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
ALTL
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWI vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACWI vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank
ACWI
ALTL
ACWI vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWI | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.49 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.03 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.98 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 10.34 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWI | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.49 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.18 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.62 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI and ALTL is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ACWI vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison
ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than ALTL's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.59% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 1.07% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ACWI vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and ALTL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWI | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | -31.91% | -24.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -9.79% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -31.91% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -5.43% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.69% | -11.85% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.82% | -0.28% |
Volatility
ACWI vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) at 2.97%. This indicates that ACWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACWI | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 2.97% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 13.20% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 18.61% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 18.23% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 20.11% | -3.03% |