ACWDX vs. UMBHX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ACWDX (AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACWDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.

Performance

ACWDX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACWDX

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 13.38%
• 1Y: 18.40%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 4.97%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

UMBHX

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWDX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	2.19%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWDX and UMBHX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.96

Return for Risk

ACWDX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWDX

ACWDX Risk / Return Rank: 16
ACWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ACWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ACWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ACWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ACWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

UMBHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWDX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWDX	UMBHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.63	—	—

Drawdowns

ACWDX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWDX drawdown since its inception was -38.86%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWDX and UMBHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWDX	UMBHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.86%	-5.16%	-33.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	0.00%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-1.30%	-8.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACWDX	UMBHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.15%	33.32%	-11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.10%	33.32%	-11.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.40%	33.32%	-9.92%

ACWDX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWDX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWDX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.74%	0.00%	2.04%	58.27%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWDX and UMBHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ACWDX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.