ACWDX vs. TMDIX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX).
ACWDX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Nov 3, 2010. TMDIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005.
Performance
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.84% | 0.29% | 9.27% | 21.13% | -22.32% | 12.52% | 45.63% | 20.24% | -5.14% | 18.69% |
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | -10.97% | -1.76% | 10.84% | 25.07% | -22.26% | 16.75% | 33.42% | 63.26% | -4.28% | 22.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWDX achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly higher than TMDIX's -10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWDX has underperformed TMDIX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while TMDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.
ACWDX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- -2.84%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
TMDIX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -23.70%
- 1Y
- -9.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDIX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACWDX vs. TMDIX — Risk / Return Rank
ACWDX
TMDIX
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWDX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | -0.41 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | -0.40 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.94 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.52 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | -1.36 | +1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWDX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | -0.41 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.10 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.50 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWDX and TMDIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWDX nor TMDIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 58.27% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.08% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 29.72% | 18.28% | 31.06% | 16.38% | 14.44% | 5.90% | 7.73% |
Drawdowns
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWDX drawdown since its inception was -38.86%, smaller than the maximum TMDIX drawdown of -48.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWDX and TMDIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWDX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.86% | -48.73% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -25.45% | +10.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -30.53% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.86% | -35.44% | -3.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.99% | -25.45% | +10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -7.07% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 9.77% | -4.02% |
Volatility
ACWDX vs. TMDIX - Volatility Comparison
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) at 5.87%. This indicates that ACWDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACWDX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 5.87% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 16.89% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.49% | 23.42% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 20.29% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 20.99% | +2.35% |