ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and WEBG.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - ACWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while WEBG.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ACWD.L returned 28.98% vs 29.01% for WEBG.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBG.DE.

Performance

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ACWD.L is traded in USD, while WEBG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WEBG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACWD.L having a 11.54% return and WEBG.DE slightly lower at 11.50%.

ACWD.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 28.98%
• 3Y*: 21.24%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

WEBG.DE

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 13.06%
• 1Y: 29.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	11.54%	22.83%	11.62%
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist	11.50%	23.27%	11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWD.L and WEBG.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.90

The correlation between ACWD.L and WEBG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWD.L

ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWD.L	WEBG.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.37	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.44	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	3.26	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.80	13.94	-0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the WEBG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWD.L and WEBG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWD.L	WEBG.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.37	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.47	-0.74

Drawdowns

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than WEBG.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and WEBG.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWD.L	WEBG.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-17.46%	-16.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-8.86%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.79%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-1.71%	-2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.08%	+0.02%

Volatility

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE) at 3.47%. This indicates that ACWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWD.L	WEBG.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.47%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	9.33%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	12.20%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	14.36%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	14.36%	+1.49%

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBG.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ACWD.L vs. WEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWD.L nor WEBG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist	1.22%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWD.L and WEBG.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ACWD.L and WEBG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ACWD.L or WEBG.DE?

On fees, WEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWD.L or WEBG.DE?

WEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ACWD.L.

What is the main difference between ACWD.L and WEBG.DE?

ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while WEBG.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.07% for WEBG.DE.