ACWD.L vs. USSC.L
ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for USSC.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for USSC.L.
Performance
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWD.L achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than USSC.L's 12.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L has outperformed USSC.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while USSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.01% annualized return.
ACWD.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
USSC.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 12.93%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 11.57% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 25.80% | -9.85% | 24.09% |
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 12.93% | 14.73% | 8.33% | 23.17% | -10.14% | 35.22% | 8.76% | 23.19% | -15.30% | 9.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWD.L and USSC.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | 0.76 |
The correlation between ACWD.L and USSC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Financial Services
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Industrials
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Consumer Cyclical
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Communication Services
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Healthcare
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Consumer Defensive
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Energy
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Basic Materials
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Utilities
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Real Estate
ACWD.L
USSC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWD.L
USSC.L
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWD.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.40 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 14.10 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWD.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.24 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.44 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.53 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.45 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -48.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and USSC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWD.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -48.99% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -8.12% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -27.47% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -27.47% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.64% | -48.99% | +15.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.49% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.67% | -7.70% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.54% | -0.45% |
Volatility
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) have volatilities of 3.87% and 4.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWD.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 4.04% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 10.08% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 16.01% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 21.62% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 22.82% | -6.97% |
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWD.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWD.L nor USSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWD.L and USSC.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.
ACWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while USSC.L is Small Cap Value Equities. ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.30% for USSC.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWD.L and USSC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer