PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ACWD.L vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ACWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while MINV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for MINV.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.

Performance

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ACWD.L is traded in USD, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWD.L achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.11% annualized return.

ACWD.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.34%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.24%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.77%

MINV.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.62%
6M
1.22%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF		11.57%22.83%17.76%22.27%-18.37%18.77%15.91%25.80%-9.85%24.09%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.62%11.17%10.98%6.85%-9.59%14.93%1.99%23.61%-2.67%17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWD.L and MINV.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between ACWD.L and MINV.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ACWD.L
MINV.L

Technology

29.2%
21.3%

Financial Services

16.5%
14.2%

Industrials

10.9%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.4%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.9%

Healthcare

8.0%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
10.8%

Energy

4.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.0%

Utilities

2.7%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.7%

Technology

ACWD.L
29.2%
MINV.L
21.3%

Financial Services

ACWD.L
16.5%
MINV.L
14.2%

Industrials

ACWD.L
10.9%
MINV.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWD.L
9.3%
MINV.L
5.4%

Communication Services

ACWD.L
9.0%
MINV.L
11.9%

Healthcare

ACWD.L
8.0%
MINV.L
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

ACWD.L
4.9%
MINV.L
10.8%

Energy

ACWD.L
4.3%
MINV.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

ACWD.L
3.6%
MINV.L
1.0%

Utilities

ACWD.L
2.7%
MINV.L
7.7%

Real Estate

ACWD.L
1.7%
MINV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

Often compared with ACWD.L:
ACWD.L vs. VWRA.LACWD.L vs. ACWIACWD.L vs. SWRD.LACWD.L vs. IWDA.LACWD.L vs. FWRA.LACWD.L vs. WEBN.DEACWD.L vs. IWQU.L
Often compared with MINV.L:
MINV.L vs. MVEW.LMINV.L vs. CSH2.LMINV.L vs. FULVXMINV.L vs. MVEA.LMINV.L vs. SPYMINV.L vs. VOOMINV.L vs. AOR

Return for Risk

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ACWD.L
ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ACWD.LMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.36
0.21

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.49
0.33

+3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.04

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

0.28

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

0.69

+13.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWD.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ACWD.LMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

0.21

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Drawdowns

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and MINV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ACWD.LMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-28.90%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-6.06%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-8.19%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-19.14%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.64%

-28.90%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-4.06%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-3.37%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.42%

-0.33%

Volatility

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.03%. This indicates that ACWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ACWD.LMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

2.03%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

5.75%

+4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

7.98%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

10.85%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

12.07%

+3.78%

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWD.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWD.L nor MINV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

ACWD.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWD.L and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer