ACWD.L vs. G500.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and G500.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)) are both Global Equities funds - ACWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while G500.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACWD.L returned 11.05%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for G500.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for G500.L.

Performance

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ACWD.L is traded in USD, while G500.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the G500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACWD.L having a 11.10% return and G500.L slightly lower at 10.60%.

ACWD.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 9.52%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 1Y: 23.82%
• 3Y*: 19.08%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

G500.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 10.32%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	11.10%	22.83%	17.76%	22.27%	-18.37%	18.77%	24.91%
G500.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)	10.60%	26.32%	22.89%	31.47%	-28.53%	27.78%	32.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWD.L and G500.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020	0.90

The correlation between ACWD.L and G500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACWD.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWD.L

ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

G500.L

G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWD.L	G500.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.53	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.30	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.27	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	1.82	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	6.85	+3.96

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWD.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum G500.L drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and G500.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWD.L	G500.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-39.54%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-12.56%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-17.75%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.18%	-39.54%	+13.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-0.10%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-8.08%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	3.34%	-1.14%

Volatility

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) is 3.28%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that ACWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWD.L	G500.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	3.57%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.70%	11.66%	-0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	14.98%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.66%	20.37%	-4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	20.09%	-4.36%

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than G500.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ACWD.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWD.L nor G500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWD.L and G500.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ACWD.L and G500.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ACWD.L or G500.L?

On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWD.L or G500.L?

G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ACWD.L.

What is the main difference between ACWD.L and G500.L?

ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.05% for G500.L.