ACVU vs. JHDV
ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and JHDV (John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACVU returned 23.84% vs 33.63% for JHDV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for JHDV.
Performance
ACVU vs. JHDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACVU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than JHDV's 18.74% return.
ACVU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHDV
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 7.45%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVU vs. JHDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 11.06% | 14.54% | 9.83% | 8.32% |
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | 18.74% | 14.76% | 20.25% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVU and JHDV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between ACVU and JHDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVU vs. JHDV — Risk / Return Rank
ACVU
JHDV
ACVU vs. JHDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVU | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.51 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 4.09 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | 17.15 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVU | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.88 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
ACVU vs. JHDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVU drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum JHDV drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVU and JHDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVU | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -18.97% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -8.26% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -1.05% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -2.62% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ACVU vs. JHDV - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVU | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.29% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 8.96% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 11.77% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 15.69% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 15.69% | -3.39% |
ACVU vs. JHDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JHDV's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVU vs. JHDV - Dividend Comparison
ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than JHDV's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 3.91% | 2.87% | 0.00% |
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | 1.99% | 2.40% | 2.50% | 2.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVU and JHDV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHDV has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to ACVU (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVU dropped -13.11% vs JHDV's -18.97%.
On 1-year performance, JHDV leads with 33.63% vs 23.84% for ACVU. On fees, JHDV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 33.63% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHDV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACVU.
JHDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.77% for ACVU.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.34% for JHDV.
JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVU and JHDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer