ACVU vs. HSRT
ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while HSRT is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index. ACVU is actively managed, while HSRT is passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HSRT.
Performance
ACVU vs. HSRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACVU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVU vs. HSRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 11.06% | 14.54% | 9.83% | 8.32% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 6.44% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVU and HSRT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVU vs. HSRT — Risk / Return Rank
ACVU
HSRT
ACVU vs. HSRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVU | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVU | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ACVU vs. HSRT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVU | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility
ACVU vs. HSRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVU | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | — | — |
ACVU vs. HSRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HSRT's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVU vs. HSRT - Dividend Comparison
ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 3.91% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVU and HSRT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACVU.
ACVU has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
ACVU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HSRT is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.24% for HSRT.
Find the right allocation for ACVU and HSRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer