ACVF vs. WLTG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG).

ACVF and WLTG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACVF is an actively managed fund by Ridgeline Research LLC. It was launched on Oct 29, 2020. WLTG is an actively managed fund by WealthTrust. It was launched on Dec 6, 2021.

Performance

ACVF vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACVF vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	-3.45%	13.67%	20.56%	23.81%	-15.74%	2.17%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	-2.68%	24.55%	26.90%	17.00%	-22.64%	1.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly lower than WLTG's -2.68% return.

ACVF

• 1D: 2.40%
• 1M: -4.95%
• YTD: -3.45%
• 6M: -3.15%
• 1Y: 11.87%
• 3Y*: 15.53%
• 5Y*: 10.53%
• 10Y*: —

WLTG

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -5.29%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 25.35%
• 3Y*: 20.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVF vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACVF and WLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

ACVF

American Conservative Values ETF

WLTG

WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

Return for Risk

ACVF vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 44
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 83
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVF vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.53	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	2.18	-1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	2.68	-1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	11.01	-5.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACVF vs. WLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the WLTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVF and WLTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	1.53	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.54	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and WLTG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ACVF vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than WLTG's 4.55% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.61%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.55%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, roughly equal to the maximum WLTG drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and WLTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.39%	-25.14%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.53%	-9.56%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-6.91%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-9.40%	+4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	2.33%	+0.12%

Volatility

ACVF vs. WLTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is 4.99%, while WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that ACVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	5.68%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	10.88%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	16.70%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	15.24%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	15.24%	+0.85%