ACVF vs. WLTG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACVF returned 19.83%/yr vs 24.05%/yr for WLTG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ACVF vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than WLTG's 8.39% return.

ACVF

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 6.31%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: —

WLTG

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 24.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVF vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	11.18%	13.67%	20.56%	23.81%	-15.74%	2.17%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	8.39%	24.55%	26.90%	17.00%	-22.64%	1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and WLTG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.92

The correlation between ACVF and WLTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACVF vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 58
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 67
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVF vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.24	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.08	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.40	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.16	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	14.25	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACVF vs. WLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the WLTG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVF and WLTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.24	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.70	+0.33

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, roughly equal to the maximum WLTG drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and WLTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.39%	-25.14%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-9.56%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-17.12%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-9.08%	+4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	2.12%	-0.23%

Volatility

ACVF vs. WLTG - Volatility Comparison

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) at 2.75%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVF	WLTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	2.75%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	10.14%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	13.29%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	15.14%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	15.14%	+0.83%

ACVF vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACVF and WLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ACVF vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than WLTG's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.53%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.09%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVF and WLTG in my portfolio?

ACVF and WLTG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVF or WLTG?

ACVF has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to WLTG (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs WLTG's -25.14%.

Which ETF is better, ACVF or WLTG?

On 3-year performance, WLTG leads with 24.05% vs 19.83% for ACVF. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, WLTG has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVF or WLTG?

Over the 3-year period, WLTG has performed better with a 24.05% return vs 19.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVF or WLTG?

ACVF and WLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVF or WLTG?

WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.53% for ACVF.

What is the main difference between ACVF and WLTG?

They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and WealthTrust.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.