ACVF vs. TEXN
ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACVF is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. Over the past year, ACVF returned 16.84% vs 30.05% for TEXN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.
Performance
ACVF vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 20.05% return.
ACVF
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- —
TEXN
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 30.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVF vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 8.21% | 7.98% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 20.05% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVF and TEXN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.63 |
ACVF vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACVF
TEXN
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ACVF
TEXN
Financial Services
ACVF
TEXN
Industrials
ACVF
TEXN
Consumer Cyclical
ACVF
TEXN
Healthcare
ACVF
TEXN
Consumer Defensive
ACVF
TEXN
Communication Services
ACVF
TEXN
Energy
ACVF
TEXN
Utilities
ACVF
TEXN
Real Estate
ACVF
TEXN
Basic Materials
ACVF
TEXN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVF vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank
ACVF
TEXN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACVF vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACVF | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACVF vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and TEXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVF | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -6.34% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -6.34% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -4.90% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -1.24% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
ACVF vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVF | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 14.50% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 14.50% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 14.50% | +1.51% |
ACVF vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVF vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison
ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than TEXN's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 1.40% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVF and TEXN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 30.05% vs 16.84% for ACVF. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 30.05% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.55% for ACVF.
They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.20% for TEXN.
Find the right allocation for ACVF and TEXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer