ACV vs. PXSGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX).
ACV is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on May 26, 2015. PXSGX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006.
Performance
ACV vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACV vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | -4.95% | 33.70% | 15.39% | 25.96% | -35.98% | 24.45% | 45.80% | 44.15% | -7.01% | 27.95% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -9.88% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACV achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ACV has outperformed PXSGX with an annualized return of 15.49%, while PXSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.
ACV
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 36.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -23.38%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- -5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACV vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACV has a 2.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACV vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank
ACV
PXSGX
ACV vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACV | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | -1.05 | +2.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | -1.56 | +3.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.83 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | -0.81 | +3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | -1.81 | +12.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACV | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | -1.05 | +2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | -0.24 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.40 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACV and PXSGX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ACV vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison
ACV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, less than PXSGX's 53.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | 10.39% | 9.68% | 9.84% | 10.30% | 12.69% | 24.19% | 7.28% | 8.15% | 10.76% | 9.18% | 10.67% | 5.52% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 53.16% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Drawdowns
ACV vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACV drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PXSGX drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACV and PXSGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACV | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -53.72% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -28.55% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.80% | -42.49% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.64% | -42.49% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.12% | -40.54% | +28.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -11.52% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 12.74% | -9.29% |
Volatility
ACV vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) at 5.59%. This indicates that ACV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACV | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 5.59% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.57% | 13.19% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.70% | 21.91% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 24.81% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 22.52% | +3.16% |