ACUSX vs. QKACX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACUSX (Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund) and QKACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACUSX returned 7.63%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for QKACX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACUSX charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for QKACX.

Performance

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACUSX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly higher than QKACX's 8.05% return.

ACUSX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 9.11%
• 1Y: 22.05%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: —

QKACX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: 25.34%
• 5Y*: 15.99%
• 10Y*: 17.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund	9.66%	13.11%	15.45%	17.27%	-21.05%	15.90%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	8.05%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	26.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ACUSX and QKACX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between ACUSX and QKACX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ACUSX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACUSX

ACUSX Risk / Return Rank: 61
ACUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ACUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ACUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ACUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ACUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 60
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACUSX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.13	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.09	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.94	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	13.79	-0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the QKACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACUSX and QKACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACUSX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.13	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.92	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.48	-0.48

Drawdowns

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACUSX drawdown since its inception was -96.85%, which is greater than QKACX's maximum drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACUSX and QKACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACUSX	QKACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.85%	-60.51%	-36.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.82%	-8.66%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.85%	-19.42%	-77.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.85%	-23.05%	-73.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.57%	0.00%	-95.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-11.21%	-20.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	1.85%	-0.18%

Volatility

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison

Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) at 2.55%. This indicates that ACUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QKACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACUSX	QKACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	2.55%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	9.51%	-1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.26%	11.99%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,173.45%	17.37%	+1,156.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,150.78%	18.70%	+1,132.08%

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACUSX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACUSX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison

ACUSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.37%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACUSX and QKACX in my portfolio?

ACUSX and QKACX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACUSX or QKACX?

ACUSX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to QKACX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACUSX dropped -96.85% vs QKACX's -60.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.