PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (ACUG.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACUG.DE achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly lower than EDM2.DE's 26.35% return.


ACUG.DE

1D
-1.21%
1M
2.49%
YTD
16.73%
6M
17.14%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
10Y*

EDM2.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
6.14%
YTD
26.35%
6M
28.13%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ACUG.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)
16.73%13.06%11.24%-2.80%-11.79%-4.08%
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
26.35%19.81%13.36%4.56%-16.00%-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ACUG.DE and EDM2.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.92

The correlation between ACUG.DE and EDM2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACUG.DE
ACUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ACUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ACUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EDM2.DE
EDM2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (ACUG.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACUG.DEEDM2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.32

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

15.65

-5.24

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACUG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACUG.DE and EDM2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACUG.DEEDM2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.63

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.49

-0.24

Drawdowns

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum EDM2.DE drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACUG.DE and EDM2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACUG.DEEDM2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-32.32%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-10.88%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-19.52%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-2.66%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-11.10%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.01%

-0.06%

Volatility

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (ACUG.DE) is 6.12%, while iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that ACUG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDM2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACUG.DEEDM2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

7.43%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

15.11%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

17.92%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

16.83%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

19.13%

-2.27%

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACUG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EDM2.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ACUG.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Dividend Comparison

ACUG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while EDM2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ACUG.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.66%1.93%2.11%2.26%2.28%1.69%
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ACUG.DE and EDM2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EDM2.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDM2.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ACUG.DE.

ACUG.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Filtered PAB, while EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ACUG.DE and 0.18% for EDM2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACUG.DE and EDM2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer