ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE
ACU2.DE (Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and MVEA.DE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ACU2.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while MVEA.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACU2.DE returned 12.95%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for MVEA.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACU2.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MVEA.DE.
Performance
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU2.DE achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly higher than MVEA.DE's 2.43% return.
ACU2.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
MVEA.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- —
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU2.DE Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR | 13.23% | 1.61% | 26.66% | 22.75% | -15.77% | 38.66% | 20.20% |
MVEA.DE iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF | 2.43% | -7.09% | 19.73% | 8.74% | -6.83% | 34.90% | 5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU2.DE and MVEA.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACU2.DE and MVEA.DE has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ACU2.DE
MVEA.DE
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACU2.DE | MVEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 0.17 | +2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 0.35 | +8.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACU2.DE | MVEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.09 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.55 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.66 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than MVEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU2.DE and MVEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU2.DE | MVEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -17.47% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -4.92% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -17.47% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -17.47% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.27% | +10.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -5.38% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.39% | +0.49% |
Volatility
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.DE) at 2.72%. This indicates that ACU2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU2.DE | MVEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.72% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 5.90% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 8.97% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 12.27% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 12.79% | +3.45% |
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACU2.DE vs. MVEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACU2.DE nor MVEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU2.DE and MVEA.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MVEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ACU2.DE.
ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while MVEA.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ACU2.DE and 0.20% for MVEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for ACU2.DE and MVEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer