ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE
ACU2.DE (Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACU2.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACU2.DE returned 14.18%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACU2.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU2.DE achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU2.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 14.18%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
ACU2.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU2.DE Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR | 13.23% | 1.61% | 26.66% | 22.75% | -15.77% | 38.66% | 9.40% | 34.49% | -1.28% | 6.75% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU2.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ACU2.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ACU2.DE
LSMC.DE
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACU2.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.59 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 10.37 | -7.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 32.83 | -23.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACU2.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 4.27 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.15 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.82 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU2.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU2.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -39.77% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -12.53% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -36.22% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -39.77% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.31% | -39.77% | +5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.34% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -9.37% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.96% | -1.08% |
Volatility
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) is 3.21%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that ACU2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU2.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 11.23% | -8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 22.18% | -13.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 30.40% | -17.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 31.21% | -15.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 26.06% | -9.82% |
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACU2.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACU2.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU2.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACU2.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACU2.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
ACU2.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ACU2.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ACU2.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer