ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE
ACU2.DE (Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - ACU2.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while DBX8.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACU2.DE returned 14.18%/yr vs 16.74%/yr for DBX8.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACU2.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBX8.DE.
Performance
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU2.DE achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBX8.DE's 109.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU2.DE has underperformed DBX8.DE with an annualized return of 14.18%, while DBX8.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.74% annualized return.
ACU2.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
DBX8.DE
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 6M
- 127.53%
- 1Y
- 227.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU2.DE Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR | 13.23% | 1.61% | 26.66% | 22.75% | -15.77% | 38.66% | 9.40% | 34.49% | -1.28% | 6.75% |
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 109.21% | 77.39% | -18.45% | 15.93% | -23.95% | -0.54% | 30.13% | 14.92% | -18.04% | 28.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU2.DE and DBX8.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ACU2.DE and DBX8.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ACU2.DE
DBX8.DE
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACU2.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.75 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 10.67 | -8.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 32.63 | -23.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACU2.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 5.17 | -3.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.72 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.66 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.31 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum DBX8.DE drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU2.DE and DBX8.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU2.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -68.01% | +33.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -21.19% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -30.70% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -41.29% | +17.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.31% | -41.89% | +7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.82% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -17.55% | +13.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 6.94% | -4.06% |
Volatility
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) is 3.21%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a volatility of 17.08%. This indicates that ACU2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU2.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 17.08% | -13.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 33.48% | -24.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 43.73% | -30.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 27.53% | -12.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 26.03% | -9.79% |
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX8.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACU2.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACU2.DE nor DBX8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU2.DE and DBX8.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACU2.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACU2.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
ACU2.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBX8.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ACU2.DE and 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
Find the right allocation for ACU2.DE and DBX8.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer