ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE
ACU2.DE (Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and BBUS.DE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ACU2.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while BBUS.DE tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACU2.DE returned 12.95%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for BBUS.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACU2.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBUS.DE.
Performance
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU2.DE achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS.DE's 11.12% return.
ACU2.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
BBUS.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU2.DE Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR | 13.23% | 1.61% | 26.66% | 22.75% | -15.77% | 38.66% | 9.40% | 14.10% |
BBUS.DE JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.12% | 4.72% | 32.23% | 23.40% | -15.59% | 38.84% | 9.02% | 14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU2.DE and BBUS.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ACU2.DE and BBUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ACU2.DE
BBUS.DE
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACU2.DE | BBUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 3.38 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 11.81 | -2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACU2.DE | BBUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.14 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.92 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS.DE drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU2.DE and BBUS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU2.DE | BBUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -34.09% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -7.38% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -23.46% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -23.46% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.37% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -4.79% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.12% | +0.76% |
Volatility
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBUS.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that ACU2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU2.DE | BBUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.68% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 7.68% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 11.64% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 15.34% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.18% | -0.94% |
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACU2.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACU2.DE nor BBUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ACU2.DE and BBUS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ACU2.DE.
ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while BBUS.DE tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ACU2.DE and 0.05% for BBUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for ACU2.DE and BBUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer