ACTV vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACTV (LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACTV is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Redwood, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. ACTV is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACTV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

ACTV vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACTV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTV vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF	0.00%	3.13%	-1.70%	15.22%	-19.33%	25.52%	27.02%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-11.86%	8.18%	-0.97%	27.57%	63.71%	20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTV and OILK is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020	0.17

The correlation between ACTV and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACTV vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACTV	OILK
Financial Services	98.5%	-
Technology	30.1%	-
Communication Services	12.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	100.0%
Real Estate	9.3%	-
Healthcare	7.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	-
Industrials	6.6%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Energy	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

ACTV vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACTV vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACTV	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.12	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ACTV	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-83.76%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.35%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.66%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.61%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACTV	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	28.75%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	30.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	35.97%	—

ACTV vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACTV vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

ACTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF	1.28%	1.28%	0.80%	1.18%	0.28%	7.63%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACTV and OILK in my portfolio?

ACTV and OILK have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACTV or OILK?

On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACTV or OILK?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACTV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACTV or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.28% for ACTV.

What is the main difference between ACTV and OILK?

ACTV is categorized as Global Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Redwood and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACTV and 0.68% for OILK.