ACTV vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACTV (LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACTV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

ACTV vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACTV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 40.11%
• 6M: 39.78%
• 1Y: 75.95%
• 3Y*: 39.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTV vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF	0.00%	3.13%	-1.70%	18.62%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	40.11%	32.00%	29.23%	25.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTV and FWD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.51

The correlation between ACTV and FWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACTV vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACTV	FWD
Financial Services	98.5%	0.5%
Technology	30.1%	52.6%
Communication Services	12.3%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	2.4%
Real Estate	9.3%	0.7%
Healthcare	7.1%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	0.8%
Industrials	6.6%	17.7%
Utilities	3.0%	1.0%
Energy	2.1%	2.6%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.8%

Return for Risk

ACTV vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACTV vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACTV	FWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.67	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ACTV	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.02%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.27%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.06%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACTV	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.15%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.72%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.72%	—

ACTV vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACTV vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

ACTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF	1.28%	1.28%	0.80%	1.18%	0.28%	7.63%	0.11%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACTV and FWD in my portfolio?

ACTV and FWD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACTV or FWD?

On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACTV or FWD?

FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACTV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACTV or FWD?

ACTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between ACTV and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Redwood and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACTV and 0.65% for FWD.