PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSTX vs. GTDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSTX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 49.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ACSTX has outperformed GTDDX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while GTDDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.


ACSTX

1D
0.45%
1M
3.08%
YTD
9.14%
6M
10.66%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
12.56%

GTDDX

1D
1.53%
1M
21.98%
YTD
49.96%
6M
55.26%
1Y
78.97%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACSTX
Invesco Comstock Fund
9.14%17.22%15.00%12.37%0.74%33.33%-0.78%24.35%-12.34%17.75%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
49.96%29.88%-0.66%8.82%-17.70%-7.00%17.19%29.99%-18.77%30.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSTX and GTDDX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 1994

0.55

The correlation between ACSTX and GTDDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSTX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSTX
ACSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GTDDX
GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACSTXGTDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.74

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

5.47

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

21.76

-10.12

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the GTDDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSTX and GTDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACSTXGTDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

4.11

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.55

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.62

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.35

+0.16

Drawdowns

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSTX drawdown since its inception was -58.61%, smaller than the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSTX and GTDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSTXGTDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.61%

-62.89%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-14.49%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-16.08%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-37.56%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

-39.58%

-5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-18.75%

+9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.63%

-1.53%

Volatility

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) is 2.48%, while Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that ACSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSTXGTDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

7.89%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

16.72%

-8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

19.29%

-8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

16.38%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

16.91%

+2.55%

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSTX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSTX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison

ACSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, less than GTDDX's 14.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACSTX
Invesco Comstock Fund
8.10%8.79%10.17%8.44%13.00%8.66%2.05%6.66%10.03%3.60%6.98%1.10%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
14.09%21.13%1.16%1.51%1.17%4.46%5.05%1.49%1.53%0.71%0.86%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSTX and GTDDX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTDDX has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to ACSTX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSTX dropped -58.61% vs GTDDX's -62.89%.

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSTX and GTDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer