PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTDDX vs. JOEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (JOEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTDDX achieves a 41.81% return, which is significantly higher than JOEMX's 19.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTDDX having a 9.99% annualized return and JOEMX not far behind at 9.95%.


GTDDX

1D
0.65%
1M
2.06%
YTD
41.81%
6M
43.99%
1Y
65.35%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
9.99%

JOEMX

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.97%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.77%
1Y
37.89%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
41.81%29.88%-0.66%8.82%-17.70%-7.00%17.19%29.99%-18.77%30.34%
JOEMX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
19.05%36.38%6.03%7.18%-15.74%1.29%16.46%14.86%-14.73%34.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GTDDX and JOEMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2012

0.80

The correlation between GTDDX and JOEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTDDX vs. JOEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTDDX
GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

JOEMX
JOEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JOEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JOEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (JOEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTDDXJOEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.38

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

2.55

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.18

9.29

+7.89

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTDDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the JOEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTDDX and JOEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTDDX drawdown since its inception was -62.89%, which is greater than JOEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTDDX and JOEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTDDXJOEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.89%

-38.23%

-24.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-15.66%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-15.73%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.93%

-28.88%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.58%

-38.23%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-3.95%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-11.53%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

4.25%

-0.39%

Volatility

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a higher volatility of 12.73% compared to JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (JOEMX) at 9.98%. This indicates that GTDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JOEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTDDXJOEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.73%

9.98%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.02%

17.38%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.12%

19.72%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.11%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.25%

-0.06%

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTDDX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JOEMX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTDDX vs. JOEMX - Dividend Comparison

GTDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, more than JOEMX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
14.90%21.13%1.16%1.51%1.17%4.46%5.05%1.49%1.53%0.71%0.86%0.99%
JOEMX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
3.38%4.03%1.22%1.76%2.08%3.67%1.13%3.85%4.55%0.63%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTDDX and JOEMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTDDX has higher volatility (12.73%) compared to JOEMX (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTDDX dropped -62.89% vs JOEMX's -38.23%.

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTDDX and JOEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer