ACSI vs. NACP
ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ACSI tracks the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACSI returned 9.12%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
ACSI vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
ACSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 9.66% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 24.88% | -10.81% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSI and NACP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ACSI and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACSI vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACSI
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACSI
NACP
Communication Services
ACSI
NACP
Technology
ACSI
NACP
Consumer Defensive
ACSI
NACP
Financial Services
ACSI
NACP
Healthcare
ACSI
NACP
Industrials
ACSI
NACP
Utilities
ACSI
NACP
Energy
ACSI
NACP
Basic Materials
ACSI
-
NACP
Real Estate
ACSI
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSI vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
ACSI
NACP
ACSI vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSI | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.54 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.56 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 20.04 | -10.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSI | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 3.14 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.92 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.93 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
ACSI vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSI | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -30.96% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -9.65% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | -19.66% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -27.89% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -0.13% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -5.75% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.19% | -0.21% |
Volatility
ACSI vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 4.16%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSI | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.44% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 11.13% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 14.02% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 17.47% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 18.70% | -1.27% |
ACSI vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSI vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSI and NACP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to ACSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.
ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSI and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer