ACSI vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ACSI is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

ACSI vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACSI

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 5.55%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 9.77%
• 1Y: 18.71%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSI vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	-0.07%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSI and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

ACSI vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACSI	GRW
Consumer Cyclical	24.2%	8.3%
Communication Services	15.4%	9.1%
Technology	12.5%	26.6%
Consumer Defensive	12.4%	-
Financial Services	9.6%	9.8%
Healthcare	8.5%	4.1%
Industrials	7.3%	38.1%
Utilities	3.9%	-
Energy	3.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ACSI vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 48
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSI vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACSI	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACSI	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	14.00	-13.25

Drawdowns

ACSI vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSI	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-0.45%	-34.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.38%	-0.45%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-0.14%	-5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACSI	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	10.19%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.66%	10.19%	+6.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	10.19%	+7.24%

ACSI vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSI vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.83%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSI and GRW in my portfolio?

ACSI and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACSI or GRW?

On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSI or GRW?

ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSI or GRW?

ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between ACSI and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.75% for GRW.