ACSI vs. AIQ
ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACSI returned 9.12%/yr vs 19.07%/yr for AIQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
ACSI vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.
ACSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 9.66% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 24.88% | -6.59% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSI and AIQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ACSI and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACSI vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACSI
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACSI
AIQ
Communication Services
ACSI
AIQ
Technology
ACSI
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
ACSI
AIQ
-
Financial Services
ACSI
AIQ
Healthcare
ACSI
AIQ
Industrials
ACSI
AIQ
Utilities
ACSI
AIQ
-
Energy
ACSI
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
ACSI
-
AIQ
-
Real Estate
ACSI
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSI vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
ACSI
AIQ
ACSI vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSI | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.22 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 14.59 | -5.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSI | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 3.02 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.76 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ACSI vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSI | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -44.66% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -16.47% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | -26.35% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -44.66% | +19.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -1.40% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -9.80% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 4.76% | -2.78% |
Volatility
ACSI vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 4.16%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSI | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 8.60% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 18.46% | -9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 23.04% | -11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 25.33% | -8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 25.50% | -8.07% |
ACSI vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSI vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSI and AIQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to ACSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 19.07% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSI and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer