PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSG vs. RZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSG vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSG achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 30.50% return.


ACSG

1D
0.91%
1M
4.36%
YTD
20.88%
6M
17.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RZG

1D
1.28%
1M
8.82%
YTD
30.50%
6M
26.21%
1Y
43.68%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSG vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACSG and RZG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.90

ACSG vs. RZG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACSG
RZG

Technology

26.1%
18.4%

Industrials

22.4%
16.8%

Healthcare

21.2%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
9.1%

Financial Services

7.6%
15.4%

Basic Materials

3.8%
0.4%

Energy

2.8%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.4%

Utilities

2.0%
0.4%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
5.5%

Technology

ACSG
26.1%
RZG
18.4%

Industrials

ACSG
22.4%
RZG
16.8%

Healthcare

ACSG
21.2%
RZG
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ACSG
8.2%
RZG
9.1%

Financial Services

ACSG
7.6%
RZG
15.4%

Basic Materials

ACSG
3.8%
RZG
0.4%

Energy

ACSG
2.8%
RZG
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

ACSG
2.4%
RZG
5.4%

Utilities

ACSG
2.0%
RZG
0.4%

Communication Services

ACSG
1.9%
RZG
3.5%

Real Estate

ACSG
1.8%
RZG
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSG vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RZG
RZG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSG vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACSGRZGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.20

ACSG vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACSG vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSG drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSG and RZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSGRZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-58.52%

+45.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-12.09%

+9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

Volatility

ACSG vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSGRZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.85%

18.96%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

23.05%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

24.64%

-1.79%

ACSG vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSG vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACSG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
0.43%0.37%0.95%1.43%1.59%0.22%0.49%0.70%0.46%0.44%0.65%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSG and RZG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RZG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RZG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.

RZG has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSG and 0.35% for RZG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSG and RZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer