ACRNX vs. EEOFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX).
ACRNX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 10, 1970. EEOFX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on Sep 1, 2017.
Performance
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | -4.65% | 4.80% | 14.46% | 21.85% | -33.80% | 8.62% | 29.65% | 26.65% | -8.82% | 9.95% |
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund | 0.37% | 23.55% | 1.32% | -1.53% | -27.88% | 10.83% | 62.80% | 25.43% | -15.79% | 3.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than EEOFX's 0.37% return.
ACRNX
- 1D
- 4.78%
- 1M
- -9.29%
- YTD
- -4.65%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
EEOFX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 33.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than EEOFX's 2.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACRNX vs. EEOFX — Risk / Return Rank
ACRNX
EEOFX
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACRNX | EEOFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.52 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 2.12 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.27 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.09 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 6.79 | -3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACRNX | EEOFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.52 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.07 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.28 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACRNX and EEOFX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Dividend Comparison
ACRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 26.17% | 13.28% | 11.43% | 8.55% | 23.63% | 39.09% | 63.48% |
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 6.63% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than EEOFX's maximum drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and EEOFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACRNX | EEOFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -50.17% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -13.49% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.58% | -50.17% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.44% | -22.58% | +6.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.79% | -19.83% | +11.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.28% | +0.26% |
Volatility
ACRNX vs. EEOFX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) at 7.95%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACRNX | EEOFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 7.95% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 16.62% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 23.25% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 24.89% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 24.72% | -1.79% |