PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ACOMO.AS (Amsterdam Commodities NV) and RWE.DE (RWE AG) are both stocks. ACOMO.AS operates in Food Distribution (Consumer Defensive), while RWE.DE operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, ACOMO.AS returned 5.06%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for RWE.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amsterdam Commodities NV (ACOMO.AS) and RWE AG (RWE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACOMO.AS achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than RWE.DE's 26.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ACOMO.AS has underperformed RWE.DE with an annualized return of 5.06%, while RWE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.

ACOMO.AS

1D
0.68%
1M
-14.23%
YTD
-4.99%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
5.06%

RWE.DE

1D
0.32%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
26.80%
6M
32.48%
1Y
71.47%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACOMO.AS
Amsterdam Commodities NV		-4.99%49.20%5.25%-2.55%-20.15%19.14%6.65%25.25%-24.00%20.67%
RWE.DE
RWE AG		26.80%62.21%-27.81%1.17%19.08%6.06%29.69%48.79%14.26%43.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ACOMO.AS and RWE.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2006

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amsterdam Commodities NV

RWE AG

Often compared with ACOMO.AS:
ACOMO.AS vs. NTBACOMO.AS vs. VOOACOMO.AS vs. FQT.DEACOMO.AS vs. MSTRACOMO.AS vs. 0014.HKACOMO.AS vs. PRX.ASACOMO.AS vs. IBKR
Often compared with RWE.DE:
RWE.DE vs. EONGYRWE.DE vs. AEERWE.DE vs. ORSTED.CORWE.DE vs. TSRWE.DE vs. VSTRWE.DE vs. BYW6.DERWE.DE vs. DAX

Return for Risk

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ACOMO.AS
ACOMO.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ACOMO.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACOMO.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACOMO.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ACOMO.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACOMO.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
RWE.DE
RWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amsterdam Commodities NV (ACOMO.AS) and RWE AG (RWE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ACOMO.ASRWE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.16
2.90

-2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.35
3.81

-3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.47

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

6.82

-6.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

16.33

-15.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACOMO.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the RWE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACOMO.AS and RWE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ACOMO.ASRWE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.90

-2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.62

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.65

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.08

+0.58

Drawdowns

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACOMO.AS drawdown since its inception was -48.19%, smaller than the maximum RWE.DE drawdown of -85.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACOMO.AS and RWE.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ACOMO.ASRWE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.19%

-85.39%

+37.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-10.37%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-30.49%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

-32.19%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.19%

-39.02%

-9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.18%

-7.40%

-8.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-45.33%

+34.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.34%

-0.08%

Volatility

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amsterdam Commodities NV (ACOMO.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to RWE AG (RWE.DE) at 7.56%. This indicates that ACOMO.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ACOMO.ASRWE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

7.56%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

18.46%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

24.41%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

25.58%

-6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

28.31%

-7.87%

Dividends

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Dividend Comparison

ACOMO.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than RWE.DE's 2.13% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACOMO.AS
Amsterdam Commodities NV		6.28%5.34%6.65%6.84%5.52%0.00%5.26%4.82%6.31%4.77%4.78%4.74%
RWE.DE
RWE AG		2.13%2.43%3.47%2.19%2.16%2.38%2.31%2.56%2.64%0.00%1.10%8.54%

Financials

ACOMO.AS vs. RWE.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amsterdam Commodities NV and RWE AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions

ACOMO.AS and RWE.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACOMO.AS and RWE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer