ACLO vs. PCMM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM).

ACLO and PCMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACLO is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Nov 15, 2024. PCMM is an actively managed fund by BondBloxx. It was launched on Dec 2, 2024.

Performance

ACLO vs. PCMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACLO vs. PCMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	1.06%	5.32%	0.13%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	-0.82%	6.30%	0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than PCMM's -0.82% return.

ACLO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCMM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -0.82%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 2.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLO vs. PCMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PCMM's 0.68% expense ratio.

PCMM

BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF

ACLO

TCW AAA CLO ETF

Return for Risk

ACLO vs. PCMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 98
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

PCMM

PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 31
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLO vs. PCMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACLO	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.72	0.53	+4.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.99	0.79	+6.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.48	1.11	+1.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.69	0.85	+4.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	35.85	4.67	+31.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACLO vs. PCMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLO Sharpe Ratio is 4.72, which is higher than the PCMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLO and PCMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACLO	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.72	0.53	+4.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.75	0.88	+3.87

Correlation

The correlation between ACLO and PCMM is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ACLO vs. PCMM - Dividend Comparison

ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than PCMM's 6.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.86%	4.87%	0.59%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	6.81%	7.02%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ACLO vs. PCMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum PCMM drawdown of -4.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and PCMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACLO	PCMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.01%	-4.32%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.91%	-3.99%	+3.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-2.06%	+2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.39%	+0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.14%	0.73%	-0.59%

Volatility

ACLO vs. PCMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) is 0.39%, while BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that ACLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACLO	PCMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	1.45%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.58%	2.35%	-1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13%	5.49%	-4.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.13%	5.10%	-3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.13%	5.10%	-3.97%