ACLO vs. HSRT
ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) and HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. ACLO is actively managed, while HSRT is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACLO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HSRT.
Performance
ACLO vs. HSRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO vs. HSRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 5.32% | 0.81% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLO and HSRT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLO vs. HSRT — Risk / Return Rank
ACLO
HSRT
ACLO vs. HSRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLO | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.90 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 164.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLO | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ACLO vs. HSRT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLO | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
ACLO vs. HSRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLO | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.08% | — | — |
ACLO vs. HSRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HSRT's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ACLO vs. HSRT - Dividend Comparison
ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, while HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLO and HSRT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HSRT.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 0.24% for HSRT.
Find the right allocation for ACLO and HSRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer