ACLO vs. FARX
ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) and FARX (Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW, while FARX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Frontier. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACLO returned 5.31% vs 20.01% for FARX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACLO charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FARX.
Performance
ACLO vs. FARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than FARX's 9.60% return.
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FARX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 5.32% | 0.23% |
FARX Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF | 9.60% | 10.61% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLO and FARX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLO vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank
ACLO
FARX
ACLO vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLO | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.29 | 2.89 | +4.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.85 | 3.94 | +10.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.41 | 1.58 | +1.83 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.90 | 7.19 | +12.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 164.37 | 24.70 | +139.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLO | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29 | 2.89 | +4.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.10 | 2.12 | +2.98 |
Drawdowns
ACLO vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum FARX drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and FARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLO | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -5.83% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | -2.80% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -1.02% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.81% | -0.78% |
Volatility
ACLO vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) is 0.14%, while Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that ACLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLO | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | 1.42% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.57% | 5.49% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 6.96% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 6.94% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 6.94% | -5.86% |
ACLO vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FARX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLO vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison
ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than FARX's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
FARX Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF | 2.89% | 3.25% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLO and FARX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FARX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLO dropped -1.01% vs FARX's -5.83%.
On 1-year performance, FARX leads with 20.01% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FARX has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FARX.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.89% for FARX.
ACLO is categorized as CLO, while FARX is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 1.00% for FARX.
ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLO and FARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer