PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLO vs. FARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACLO vs. FARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than FARX's 9.60% return.


ACLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FARX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.27%
YTD
9.60%
6M
10.73%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLO vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.21%5.32%0.23%
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
9.60%10.61%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLO and FARX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLO vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FARX
FARX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLO vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLOFARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

7.29

2.89

+4.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

14.85

3.94

+10.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.41

1.58

+1.83

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

19.90

7.19

+12.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

164.37

24.70

+139.67

ACLO vs. FARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLO Sharpe Ratio is 7.29, which is higher than the FARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLO and FARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLOFARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29

2.89

+4.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.10

2.12

+2.98

Drawdowns

ACLO vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum FARX drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and FARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLOFARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-5.83%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

-2.80%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-1.02%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.81%

-0.78%

Volatility

ACLO vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) is 0.14%, while Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that ACLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLOFARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

1.42%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.57%

5.49%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

6.96%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.08%

6.94%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.08%

6.94%

-5.86%

ACLO vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FARX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACLO vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison

ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than FARX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
2.89%3.25%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACLO and FARX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FARX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLO dropped -1.01% vs FARX's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, FARX leads with 20.01% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FARX has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FARX.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.89% for FARX.

ACLO is categorized as CLO, while FARX is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 1.00% for FARX.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLO and FARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer