PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLO vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ACLO vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ACLO vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
1.06%5.32%0.81%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
1.03%5.44%0.92%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACLO having a 1.06% return and CLOA slightly lower at 1.03%.


ACLO

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.06%
6M
2.31%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOA

1D
0.08%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.32%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ACLO vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACLO and CLOA have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ACLO vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLO vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLOCLOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.59

3.33

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.77

4.52

+2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.40

2.21

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

5.03

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

32.12

36.40

-4.28

ACLO vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLO Sharpe Ratio is 4.59, which is higher than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLO and CLOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLOCLOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59

3.33

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.75

5.13

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between ACLO and CLOA is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ACLO vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than CLOA's 5.12% yield.


TTM202520242023
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.43%4.87%0.59%0.00%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
5.12%5.35%6.01%5.88%

Drawdowns

ACLO vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum CLOA drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and CLOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLOCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-1.34%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.91%

-1.10%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-0.06%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

0.15%

+0.02%

Volatility

ACLO vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.27%. This indicates that ACLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ACLOCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

0.27%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.58%

0.51%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14%

1.64%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.13%

1.35%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.13%

1.35%

-0.22%