ACLC vs. SUPP
ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACLC returned 17.71%/yr vs 19.34%/yr for SUPP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SUPP.
Performance
ACLC vs. SUPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than SUPP's 21.37% return.
ACLC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SUPP
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLC vs. SUPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.74% | 11.80% | 19.96% | 15.69% |
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 21.37% | 11.65% | 10.95% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLC and SUPP is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ACLC and SUPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLC vs. SUPP — Risk / Return Rank
ACLC
SUPP
ACLC vs. SUPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLC | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.39 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 9.82 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLC | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.68 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.89 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ACLC vs. SUPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, which is greater than SUPP's maximum drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and SUPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLC | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.44% | -25.03% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | -13.59% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -25.03% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.15% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -4.41% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 3.29% | -1.01% |
Volatility
ACLC vs. SUPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) is 2.93%, while TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that ACLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLC | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 7.15% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 16.42% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 19.38% | -7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 19.44% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 19.44% | -2.32% |
ACLC vs. SUPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SUPP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLC vs. SUPP - Dividend Comparison
ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than SUPP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 0.72% | 0.43% |
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLC and SUPP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUPP has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to ACLC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLC dropped -26.44% vs SUPP's -25.03%.
On 3-year performance, SUPP leads with 19.34% vs 17.71% for ACLC. On fees, ACLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ACLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SUPP has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 17.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.
ACLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.29% for SUPP.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.75% for SUPP.
ACLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLC and SUPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer