PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLC vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACLC vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.


ACLC

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.82%
YTD
8.74%
6M
7.84%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLC vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACLC and BUFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLC vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLC
ACLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ACLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLC vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLCBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

ACLC vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLCBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

2.68

-1.83

Drawdowns

ACLC vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLCBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.44%

-2.87%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.07%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-0.24%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

ACLC vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLCBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

3.98%

+8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

3.98%

+13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

3.98%

+13.14%

ACLC vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACLC vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ACLC
American Century Large Cap Equity ETF
0.56%0.64%0.89%1.09%1.10%0.72%0.43%
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACLC and BUFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

ACLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

ACLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: American Century and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLC and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer