ACKY vs. BITI
ACKY (VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACKY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. ACKY is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. ACKY charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
ACKY vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.
ACKY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 35.86%
- YTD
- 24.48%
- 1Y
- 64.61%
- 3Y*
- -31.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACKY vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF | -0.98% | 4.04% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 24.48% | 24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACKY and BITI is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACKY vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
ACKY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITI
ACKY vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACKY | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACKY vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACKY | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -92.16% | +77.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -86.41% | +81.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -68.40% | +64.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.16% | — |
Volatility
ACKY vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACKY | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 44.15% | -28.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 52.24% | -36.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 52.24% | -36.52% |
ACKY vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACKY vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF | 13.26% | 5.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.62% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACKY and BITI have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACKY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACKY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 13.26% for ACKY.
ACKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ACKY and 1.03% for BITI.
Find the right allocation for ACKY and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer