ACIZX vs. BLUEX
ACIZX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACIZX returned 19.36%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for BLUEX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACIZX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.
Performance
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACIZX achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -4.69% return.
ACIZX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 30.69%
- 3Y*
- 39.98%
- 5Y*
- 19.36%
- 10Y*
- —
BLUEX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -4.69%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 | 12.79% | 32.21% | 70.41% | 43.41% | -36.67% | 18.75% | 41.96% | 33.55% | -0.51% | 30.26% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -4.69% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACIZX and BLUEX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACIZX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACIZX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
ACIZX
BLUEX
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 (ACIZX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACIZX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.92 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.47 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | -1.05 | +6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACIZX drawdown since its inception was -46.45%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIZX and BLUEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACIZX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.45% | -54.27% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.52% | -12.19% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | -12.19% | -15.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.45% | -21.87% | -24.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -6.67% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -13.35% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 5.48% | +0.27% |
Volatility
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 (ACIZX) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.82%. This indicates that ACIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACIZX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 3.82% | +4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 8.73% | +9.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 10.77% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.62% | 10.79% | +17.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 16.55% | +9.15% |
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACIZX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACIZX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
ACIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 | 5.93% | 6.69% | 24.95% | 7.80% | 3.78% | 18.91% | 16.31% | 10.21% | 12.29% | 6.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACIZX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACIZX has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to BLUEX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIZX dropped -46.45% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.
ACIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACIZX and BLUEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer