ACIO vs. GTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) and GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ACIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while GTR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACIO returned 15.97%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for GTR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACIO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GTR.

Performance

ACIO vs. GTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than GTR's 8.14% return.

ACIO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: 15.88%
• 3Y*: 15.97%
• 5Y*: 10.18%
• 10Y*: —

GTR

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 19.55%
• 3Y*: 12.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIO vs. GTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF	7.22%	9.03%	21.92%	15.90%	-10.31%	7.35%
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	8.14%	12.90%	8.41%	12.45%	-19.07%	3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIO and GTR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021	0.85

The correlation between ACIO and GTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACIO vs. GTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACIO	GTR
Technology	35.2%	27.5%
Financial Services	11.9%	15.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.8%
Industrials	8.3%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	4.4%
Energy	3.6%	4.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.7%
Basic Materials	1.7%	3.7%

Return for Risk

ACIO vs. GTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIO

ACIO Risk / Return Rank: 53
ACIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ACIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ACIO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ACIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ACIO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

GTR

GTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIO vs. GTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACIO	GTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.08	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.95	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.37	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	3.29	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	13.05	-4.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACIO vs. GTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the GTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIO and GTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACIO	GTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	2.08	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.45	+0.45

Drawdowns

ACIO vs. GTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum GTR drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and GTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACIO	GTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.19%	-21.44%	+7.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-5.97%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.12%	-12.88%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.40%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-8.64%	+5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.50%	+0.30%

Volatility

ACIO vs. GTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is 2.18%, while WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that ACIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACIO	GTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	2.43%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.13%	6.88%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.26%	9.45%	-1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.05%	10.86%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.64%	10.86%	+0.78%

ACIO vs. GTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GTR's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACIO vs. GTR - Dividend Comparison

ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than GTR's 5.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF	0.38%	0.37%	0.44%	0.72%	1.51%	0.61%	1.02%	1.32%
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.31%	5.74%	5.30%	2.85%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACIO and GTR in my portfolio?

ACIO and GTR have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACIO or GTR?

GTR has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to ACIO (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIO dropped -14.19% vs GTR's -21.44%.

Which ETF is better, ACIO or GTR?

On 3-year performance, ACIO leads with 15.97% vs 12.60% for GTR. On fees, GTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, ACIO has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACIO or GTR?

Over the 3-year period, ACIO has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACIO or GTR?

GTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACIO or GTR?

GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.38% for ACIO.

What is the main difference between ACIO and GTR?

ACIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while GTR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACIO and 0.70% for GTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.