ACIO vs. DRSK
ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) and DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACIO returned 10.18%/yr vs 3.06%/yr for DRSK. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
ACIO vs. DRSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than DRSK's 3.75% return.
ACIO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- —
DRSK
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ACIO vs. DRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 7.22% | 9.03% | 21.92% | 15.90% | -10.31% | 18.03% | 9.85% | 3.32% |
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.75% | 7.67% | 12.50% | 2.08% | -9.57% | 0.88% | 13.80% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACIO and DRSK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ACIO and DRSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACIO vs. DRSK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACIO
DRSK
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ACIO
DRSK
Financial Services
ACIO
DRSK
Communication Services
ACIO
DRSK
Consumer Cyclical
ACIO
DRSK
Healthcare
ACIO
DRSK
Industrials
ACIO
DRSK
Consumer Defensive
ACIO
DRSK
Energy
ACIO
DRSK
Utilities
ACIO
DRSK
Real Estate
ACIO
DRSK
Basic Materials
ACIO
DRSK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACIO vs. DRSK — Risk / Return Rank
ACIO
DRSK
ACIO vs. DRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACIO | DRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.17 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 3.00 | +5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACIO | DRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.02 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.42 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
ACIO vs. DRSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum DRSK drawdown of -19.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and DRSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACIO | DRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -19.87% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -7.20% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | -9.60% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | -19.87% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.25% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -4.21% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.79% | -0.99% |
Volatility
ACIO vs. DRSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is 2.18%, while Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that ACIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACIO | DRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 3.00% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.13% | 5.19% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 8.26% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 7.39% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 7.06% | +4.58% |
ACIO vs. DRSK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ACIO and DRSK have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
ACIO vs. DRSK - Dividend Comparison
ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than DRSK's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.72% | 1.51% | 0.61% | 1.02% | 1.32% | 0.00% |
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.63% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACIO and DRSK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRSK has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to ACIO (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIO dropped -14.19% vs DRSK's -19.87%.
On 5-year performance, ACIO leads with 10.18% vs 3.06% for DRSK. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ACIO has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACIO has performed better with a 10.18% return vs 3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACIO and DRSK have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.38% for ACIO.
ACIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACIO and DRSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer