PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACIO vs. AVMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACIO vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than AVMA's 10.12% return.


ACIO

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.31%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

AVMA

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.64%
YTD
10.12%
6M
9.66%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIO vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ACIO
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF
5.06%9.03%21.92%8.21%
AVMA
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
10.12%16.72%10.01%8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIO and AVMA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.83

The correlation between ACIO and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACIO vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIO
ACIO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ACIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMA
AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIO vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACIOAVMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.54

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

14.86

-7.75

ACIO vs. AVMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the AVMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIO and AVMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACIO vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and AVMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIOAVMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-11.81%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.40%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-1.21%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-1.54%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.52%

+0.34%

Volatility

ACIO vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACIOAVMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.43%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

7.61%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

9.41%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

10.36%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.67%

10.36%

+1.31%

ACIO vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACIO vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison

ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than AVMA's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ACIO
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF
0.39%0.37%0.44%0.72%1.51%0.61%1.02%1.32%
AVMA
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
3.03%2.21%2.28%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACIO and AVMA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIO has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to AVMA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIO dropped -14.19% vs AVMA's -11.81%.

On 1-year performance, AVMA leads with 22.59% vs 13.16% for ACIO. On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMA has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 13.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.

AVMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 0.39% for ACIO.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACIO and 0.21% for AVMA.

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACIO and AVMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer