ACII vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACII charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

ACII vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACII

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACII vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	-1.10%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ACII and OMAH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

ACII vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACII vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACII	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-7.55	0.70	-8.25

Drawdowns

ACII vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACII drawdown since its inception was -1.27%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACII and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACII	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-11.83%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-2.65%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-1.26%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACII	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.65%	8.05%	-0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.65%	13.21%	-5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.65%	13.21%	-5.56%

ACII vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACII has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACII vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

ACII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	0.74%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACII and OMAH in my portfolio?

ACII and OMAH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACII or OMAH?

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACII or OMAH?

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACII or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.

What is the main difference between ACII and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACII and 0.95% for OMAH.