ACII vs. GPIX
ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACII charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
ACII vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACII
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -1.10% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACII and GPIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACII vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
ACII
GPIX
ACII vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACII | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -7.55 | 1.78 | -9.34 |
Drawdowns
ACII vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACII drawdown since its inception was -1.27%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACII and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACII | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -17.50% | +16.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.48% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -1.48% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
ACII vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACII | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.65% | 10.17% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 13.80% | -6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 13.80% | -6.15% |
ACII vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACII has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACII vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
ACII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than GPIX's 8.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ACII and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACII.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACII and 0.29% for GPIX.
Find the right allocation for ACII and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer