ACH vs. HSIC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Accendra Health, Inc (ACH) and Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC).

Performance

ACH vs. HSIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Accendra Health, Inc (ACH) and Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACH vs. HSIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACH Accendra Health, Inc	-18.57%	-78.58%	-32.17%	-1.33%	-55.10%	60.85%	423.84%	-18.15%	-64.51%	-44.45%
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc.	-2.49%	9.22%	-8.60%	-5.21%	3.02%	15.96%	0.21%	8.34%	12.36%	-7.88%

Fundamentals

EPS ACH : -$21.41 HSIC : $3.30
PS Ratio ACH : 0.02 HSIC : 0.67
Total Revenue (TTM) ACH : $4.72B HSIC : $13.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACH : $1.17B HSIC : $3.84B
EBITDA (TTM) ACH : $172.01M HSIC : $999.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACH achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly lower than HSIC's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ACH has underperformed HSIC with an annualized return of -24.21%, while HSIC has yielded a comparatively higher 0.84% annualized return.

ACH

• 1D: 5.56%
• 1M: -5.79%
• YTD: -18.57%
• 6M: -52.50%
• 1Y: -74.75%
• 3Y*: -46.09%
• 5Y*: -43.02%
• 10Y*: -24.21%

HSIC

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -10.55%
• YTD: -2.49%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 7.61%
• 3Y*: -3.31%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: 0.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ACH vs. HSIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACH

ACH Risk / Return Rank: 7
ACH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ACH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ACH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ACH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ACH Martin Ratio Rank: 12

HSIC

HSIC Risk / Return Rank: 49
HSIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HSIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
HSIC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HSIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HSIC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACH vs. HSIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accendra Health, Inc (ACH) and Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACH	HSIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	0.27	-1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	0.60	-2.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.07	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	0.44	-1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	1.02	-2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACH vs. HSIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACH Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the HSIC Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACH and HSIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACH	HSIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.92	0.27	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.61	0.06	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.32	0.03	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.29	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between ACH and HSIC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ACH vs. HSIC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACH nor HSIC has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACH Accendra Health, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.04%	0.19%	13.51%	5.46%	2.89%	2.81%
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ACH vs. HSIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACH drawdown since its inception was -96.08%, which is greater than HSIC's maximum drawdown of -78.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACH and HSIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACH	HSIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.08%	-78.49%	-17.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.72%	-16.93%	-62.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.08%	-32.70%	-63.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.08%	-41.42%	-54.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.32%	-19.86%	-75.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.11%	-15.24%	-9.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.14%	7.26%	+45.88%

Volatility

ACH vs. HSIC - Volatility Comparison

Accendra Health, Inc (ACH) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) at 6.82%. This indicates that ACH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACH	HSIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.04%	6.82%	+10.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.43%	19.95%	+37.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.66%	28.53%	+53.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.39%	25.56%	+44.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.54%	27.43%	+48.11%

Financials

ACH vs. HSIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Accendra Health, Inc and Henry Schein, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Accendra Health, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 708.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HSIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 3.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

ACH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Accendra Health, Inc reported an operating income of 20.91M and revenue of 708.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

HSIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.00M and revenue of 3.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

ACH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Accendra Health, Inc reported a net income of -56.33M and revenue of 708.97M, resulting in a net margin of -7.9%.

HSIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 3.44B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.