ACH vs. HSIC
ACH (Accendra Health, Inc) and HSIC (Henry Schein, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Medical Distribution industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, ACH returned -22.39%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for HSIC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACH vs. HSIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACH achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than HSIC's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ACH has underperformed HSIC with an annualized return of -22.39%, while HSIC has yielded a comparatively higher 1.17% annualized return.
ACH
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -29.52%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- -60.21%
- 3Y*
- -49.92%
- 5Y*
- -42.45%
- 10Y*
- -22.39%
HSIC
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 9.90%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.17%
ACH vs. HSIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACH Accendra Health, Inc | -5.36% | -78.58% | -32.17% | -1.33% | -55.10% | 60.85% | 423.84% | -18.15% | -64.51% | -44.45% |
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 2.47% | 9.22% | -8.60% | -5.21% | 3.02% | 15.96% | 0.21% | 8.34% | 12.36% | -7.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACH and HSIC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1995 | 0.34 |
The correlation between ACH and HSIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACH:
$203.25M
HSIC:
$8.99B
ACH:
-$14.29
HSIC:
$3.30
ACH:
0.08
HSIC:
0.69
ACH:
$2.72B
HSIC:
$13.38B
ACH:
$937.09M
HSIC:
$3.91B
ACH:
$192.32M
HSIC:
$940.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACH vs. HSIC — Risk / Return Rank
ACH
HSIC
ACH vs. HSIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accendra Health, Inc (ACH) and Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACH | HSIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.09 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 0.58 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 1.20 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACH | HSIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 0.36 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.61 | -0.00 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.29 | 0.04 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.29 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ACH vs. HSIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACH drawdown since its inception was -96.08%, which is greater than HSIC's maximum drawdown of -78.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACH and HSIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACH | HSIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.08% | -78.49% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.72% | -17.23% | -62.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.17% | -24.59% | -68.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.08% | -32.70% | -63.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.08% | -41.42% | -54.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.56% | -15.78% | -78.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -15.26% | -10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.34% | 8.30% | +51.04% |
Volatility
ACH vs. HSIC - Volatility Comparison
Accendra Health, Inc (ACH) has a higher volatility of 26.30% compared to Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) at 6.77%. This indicates that ACH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACH | HSIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.30% | 6.77% | +19.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.49% | 17.68% | +41.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.46% | 27.30% | +58.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.97% | 25.42% | +44.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.32% | 27.53% | +48.79% |
Dividends
ACH vs. HSIC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACH nor HSIC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACH Accendra Health, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.19% | 13.51% | 5.46% | 2.89% | 2.81% |
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ACH vs. HSIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accendra Health, Inc and Henry Schein, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACH vs. HSIC - Profitability Comparison
ACH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accendra Health, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 627.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HSIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 3.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
ACH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accendra Health, Inc reported an operating income of 17.13M and revenue of 627.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.
HSIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported an operating income of 194.00M and revenue of 3.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
ACH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accendra Health, Inc reported a net income of -23.55M and revenue of 627.78M, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
HSIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a net income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.37B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACH and HSIC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACH has higher volatility (26.30%) compared to HSIC (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACH dropped -96.08% vs HSIC's -78.49%.
HSIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACH and HSIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer