PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACFOX vs. BULIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACFOX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than BULIX's 4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ACFOX has outperformed BULIX with an annualized return of 19.58%, while BULIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.


ACFOX

1D
-1.06%
1M
5.78%
YTD
9.28%
6M
10.92%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
28.29%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
19.58%

BULIX

1D
1.70%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
4.40%
6M
2.91%
1Y
10.79%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
9.28%20.51%43.30%35.66%-36.32%7.08%73.31%32.30%6.51%34.55%
BULIX
American Century Utilities Fund
4.40%16.76%24.32%-7.51%-4.37%13.77%-2.38%19.94%1.82%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ACFOX and BULIX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2006

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between ACFOX and BULIX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACFOX vs. BULIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACFOX
ACFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ACFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BULIX
BULIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACFOXBULIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.26

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

3.11

+4.13

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the BULIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACFOX and BULIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACFOXBULIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.81

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.38

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.45

+0.13

Drawdowns

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACFOX drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, which is greater than BULIX's maximum drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFOX and BULIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACFOXBULIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.92%

-55.21%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.52%

-8.93%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.03%

-16.54%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

-24.56%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

-33.86%

-9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-7.38%

+6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-10.03%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

3.61%

+1.06%

Volatility

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACFOXBULIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

5.15%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

11.14%

+3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

13.85%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.28%

16.71%

+8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.81%

18.05%

+5.76%

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACFOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BULIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACFOX vs. BULIX - Dividend Comparison

ACFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than BULIX's 10.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
6.91%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.48%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.33%
BULIX
American Century Utilities Fund
10.93%11.60%2.36%2.65%7.78%7.50%7.55%2.97%6.91%7.70%6.99%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACFOX and BULIX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACFOX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to BULIX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFOX dropped -58.92% vs BULIX's -55.21%.

ACFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACFOX and BULIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer